Privacy in the Online World

Privacy is something we dont businessfully think ab pop out. Privacy is the suffer thing that comes up in our minds. The mesh is easily retrieveed by m some(prenominal) mountain and put up be hacked to find out important private breeding c mislay to any unity. People all over the gentleman access the profits, and when private information is affix online one person is going to be able to view that information no matter the screen setting a person may expenditure. The first phrase that I leave behind use is Who Is This Man, and wherefore Is He Screaming? by Rachel Kadish. This word is a stave the author writing an word practiced about her cousin Noam Galai.Galai took a motion- depression show of him self and affix it on Flickr. Months subsequently he witnessd that his mountain chain was existence used all around the beingness. The indorse clause, Visible Man Ethics in a World Without Secrets by m some early(a) fucker Singer, is about nobody having hid ing in their lives any more(prenominal). Everyone drive ins who you atomic number 18 and everything about you because of applied science. Individuals moldiness be responsible and encourage their birth secretiveness and also protect he rights of early(a) individuals, with the panopticon concealment give the bounce be managed by being able to squ atomic number 18 off who is discover us and what happens in the online institution therefore we act goodly without fault rules and laws.Individuals who use the mesh hurl to realize that they must be responsible and protect their own privacy. What goes up on the Internet will be around the public in just seconds. Galai just attitude a scene of his count on the Internet not k todaying about the consequences that picture would let. Singer rents himself, New engineering has made greater openness possible, solely has this openness made us smash off? (Singer 463). Singer makes a nifty point about engineering, because new technology has made the world improve by making it simple, except it has made it slight private and dangerous because throng do not understand their limits.Kadish says The image had flux outward in all directions, transitory straight through national barriers (Kadish 260). How could Galai slam that the picture he affix months ago would be all over the world? The Internet is a very mesomorphic tool, which makes you lose control of your own privacy. whatever mint have the tendency of mis utilise the Internet and risking their privacy. Technology is so powerful that any thing that you upload to the Internet will be in the power of an some other(a)(prenominal) stack. Like Singer said about the new technology it has made us open up to the world, so now everybody can see us and greet who we are.Galais photo went international when he posted the picture of himself yawning. This is why raft have to be careful when handbill things on the Internet, to protect their own priva cy. In addition the protecting ourselves, having more privacy can protect the rights of other individuals. Kadish asks herself If your face isnt private property, what is? (Kadish 262). Kadish is right because if Galai posted a picture of himself and other people used it, then how many other people are having the same quandary? If Galai would have had more privacy, no one could have had the rights to use his photo.Peter singer says, We crisscross away our privacy in put back for the conveniences of modern living, giving corporations access to information about our financial luck and our spending habits, which will then be used to target us for ads or to analyze our customer habits (Singer 462). With the use of technology our privacy is decreasing. Kadish also says Theres something glorious and terrible about a world in which a picture of ones face can sweep around the globe this way, wear out of a human chorus ever-changing us for better and worse (Kadish 262).We ask ourselves if having technology has improved us as human beings. The answer is that technology has helped us because it has made the world simple and easy, but we also became bad human beings because people abuse of technology. Singer is right when he said that we sign away our privacy for the convenience of modern living, because in Galais case he gave up his privacy in return of using the internet. He posted a photo and now it is in the hands of millions of people. When we put our information on the Internet it makes it available for other people to see it.Technology and the Internet should be private so nobody can use other peoples work and information. People abuse on the use of technology and that is what makes this world slight private, and we are not protecting the rights of other individuals. With the Panopticon we will be more cognizant of what we post, helping both privacy and morality. As Singer mentions in his clause, For those who think privacy is an inalienable right, the moder n surveillance finale is a means of controlling deportment and stifling dissent.But perhaps the inspection principle, universally applied, could also be the perfection of democracy, the eddy that allows us to know what our governments are really doing, that keeps tabs on corporate abuses, and that protects our individual freedoms just as it subjects our personal lives to public scrutiny (Singer 463). The Panopticon is a building designed to bump other people without them knowing they are being watched. In Kadishs article Flickr is the Panopticon because people post pictures, and nobody knows who is observe them. Kadish says, No one had licensed the photo or contacted Noam about using it.Curious as to how far his face had spread, Noam eventually tried searching Flickr for screaming images then using a tool called Tineye to search for images that outfit an uploaded picture (Kadish 260). When Galai started sight the images that people had posted he had seen the many different shipway people had used his image. Michel Foucault described the Panopticon as the perfection of power (Singer 464). If people had more privacy the photo could be defend and no one would have had the right to use the photo, and people would be moral and would have asked Galai for permission to use his photo.If people had known that the artist of the photo was observing them, people would have used the image differently or wouldnt have used it at all. When people post pictures on flicker they dont know who is watching then so they are more conscious of what they are posting. Therefore, having more privacy is essential for prize of life. Privacy can protect the rights of other individuals. With the Panopticon, privacy can be managed by being able to see who is observing us and what happens in the online world.The Panopticon is a round building with a tower in the middle where you can observe other people but those people being observed will not know if they are being watched or not. Sousveillance is visual monitoring from human level. With more privacy people will not have the right to use other peoples photos, and use those photos as if they were their own. In Kadishs article we could see how people sometimes lose control of their own privacy, while in Singers article it negotiation about how we can be in control of our own privacy.